These were troubled times. The assassinations of Political and Cultural leaders shocked the nation. The damage of the war in Southeast Asia was not confined to just
It was during this time that a phenomenon that was referred to nearly 100 yrs. ago by Teddy Roosevelt as the “hyphenation of
During the racial upheavals of the 60’s, particularly among black Americans, and the response of the politicians to this particular struggle, a new terminology came into use; African-Americans. By the 1980's the term was the politically correct word to identify an entire race of Americans. In just a few short years, this ethnic group rapidly went from being negro, to black, to colored (note: NAACP), to African-American. The long term effects of this change continue to impact our culture even today. Just ask Paula Deen.
What followed was a rapid grab by group after group for a piece of this new hyphenated American identity. What
Diversity became the goal. Laws were implemented that would enshrine ethnic and religious diversity as the highest ideal our society should pursue. However, diversity could not be confined to ethnicity or religion. If the perceived supreme good that it was believed could be achieved through ethnic / cultural diversity was to be gained, then it should be opened up to include moral diversity as well. We are now reaping the results of the acceptance of moral standards that are parents and grandparents would have considered as unthinkable perversions.
American is locked today in a struggle to include Undocumented-Americans. These individuals were previously known as Illegals. However, for reasons that appear to be far more driven by politics than any other reason, millions of individuals have now joined the realm of hyphenated Americans.
This pervasive hyphenation in so ingrained in the cultural psyche… it’s perceived benefits so generally accepted… that few question it. It has become an element of every component of our way of life. Even those who are opponents of “cultural diversity” may not even be aware of the manner in which they unknowingly participate. IMHO, nowhere is this societal reality more apparent than within the walls of the
The Church is no longer a body, but a pile of splintered, stylistic factions. Groups are identified by style, not substance. Manners of dress defines Churches. Musical style preferences contribute greatly to hyphenated Christianity. We no longer are separated by the historic macro-language barriers once marked by national identities. Language differences today reflect the micro-languages, techno-slang, and emoticons (read: feelings) that are still being developed and change very rapidly in comparison to traditional languages. Groups are identified by little more than personal preference. When it comes to deciding where to attend Church, these individual preferences can be as simple as: I like the coffee here rather than there.
I would like to edit
I would like to add that there should be two groups in the Church: Un-hyphenated Christians, and sinners. God save us from becoming Starbucks-Christians, or (private label) HeBrews-Christians. God save us from becoming Contemporary-Christians, or Traditional-Christians… or Casual Attire-Christians, or Jacket-n-Tie-Christians. We must bring an end to hyphenated Christianity… to a hyphenated Church.
There is no room in this country for
hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated
Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best
Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad.
But a hyphenated
American is not an American at all.”
“This is just as true of the man who puts “native” before
the hyphen as of the man who puts German or Irish or English or French before
the hyphen. Americanism is a matter of the spirit and of the soul. Our
allegiance must be purely to the United States . We must unsparingly
condemn any man who holds any other allegiance.”
“But if he is heartily and singly loyal to this Republic,
then no matter where he was born, he is just as good an American as any one
else.”
“The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation
to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all,
would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an
intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English- Americans,
French-Americans, Scandinavian- Americans, or Italian-Americans, each
preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with
Europeans of that nationality than with the other citizens of the American
Republic.”
“The men who do not become Americans and nothing else are
hyphenated Americans; and there ought to be no room for them in this country. The
man who calls himself an American citizen and who yet shows by his actions that
he is primarily the citizen of a foreign land, plays a thoroughly mischievous
part in the life of our body politic. He has no place here; and the sooner
he returns to the land to which he feels his real heart-allegiance, the better
it will be for every good American.”